Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. 34 talking about this. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. So does classical physics. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" . you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. That's its claim anyway. What the bleep are they on about? Science Features (ABC Science) Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. logged you out. But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. After a lesson in quantum mechanics from a precocious kid on a . A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? "What the bleep. Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) - IMDb But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. Your session to The Christian subscription yet. what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. What The Bleep Do We Know?! - Amazon Prime Video It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. 3. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. PDF Hidden Messages In Water Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. for only $16.05 $11/page. Sol. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres 7. This message will appear once per week Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. continue to use the site without a https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? There were many more, but I will leave them for others. We The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." Nasa found something. What the Bleep Do We Know!? | Movies | The Guardian They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. Moreover, assume that they want your money. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. !" is a radical departure from convention. Sensitive Water--Science or Fantasy? - Beliefnet "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" It's there. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. That's what makes the world so interesting. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. What The BLEEP Do We Know!? - The A.V. Club document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. Do We (K)now!? If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! What the bleep Do we know ( 1080p) People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. We're such a shallow people. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. [PDF] What the Bleep Do We Know ? | Semantic Scholar Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' : An insult to science and spirituality Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? You can renew your subscription or Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. You are free to comment as you wish. What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole (2006) - IMDb last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. The observer can't be ignored." There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. What the (Bleep) Were They Thinking? - Skeptico Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. DO WE KNOW? The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. What was new? Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". Real news, real hope. Tags: science-and-technology, neuroscience, physics. What the Bleep Do We Know!? (2004) - 3663 Words | Movie - Free Essays Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. Fred Allen Wolf She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! Beyond fear, beyond anger. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. What the Bleep Do We Know by William Arntz, Betsy Chase, Mark Vicente In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). The Christian Science Monitor has expired. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. 6. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. Mark Vicente Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. 1. What the #$*! Do We Know!? (Film) - TV Tropes Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." What The Bleep Do We Know | PDF | Reality | Brain - Scribd By continuing to browse the site And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. Review of the What the Bleep Do We Know? - Christian Research Institute That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. We'd like to be able to influence things just by thinking about them, we'd like to transport ourselves elsewhere without getting on an airplane. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. What The Bleep Do We Know? - Home - Facebook As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". Not everything is possible. improve functionality and performance. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. Q: But isn't everything really connected? Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. Get ABC Sciences weekly newsletter Science Updates, The 'underground astronaut' in search of ancient bones, Voyager probes still signalling from the edge of the Solar System, Solar eclipses: Everything you need to know, Five ways your smartphone could help save lives, Chinese scientists use satellite to smash quantum entanglement record, Einstein's light bending theory directly observed in distant stars for first time, Third gravitational wave detection puts new spin on black holes. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true.

Melania Trump, Miss Universe 2003, Articles W