So, the present status may mean that the EiC now needs to make a decision based on the peer review comments or on the revised manuscript. Given the 100% uniqueness, the flawless Turnitin pass is assured. The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure (s) 1a, 1b and 1c. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration. 1.2.. The editorial process is iterative and highly subjective. 2. children could induce that starting at an end Keil, F. C. (1981). Thepeer review fileis published online as a supplementary peer review file. Reviewed 2011-11-30 19:53:00. [CDATA[// > It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Use advanced features to add fillable fields, rearrange pages, date and sign the printable PDF form electronically. editor invited1editor assignedUnder ReviewUnder Review Nature Neuroscience 1 7000 2000 Review 700 Accept . The Nature of the Symbolic-Representational System in Cellular Protein Synthesis and Human Language Comprehension) 1973-1978 Northern Illinois University, B.S. //--> . To facilitate this, authors need to ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in a way that does not give away their identity. On occasion, particularly if the editors feel that additional technical expertise is needed to make a decision, they may obtain advice from an additional referee. [CDATA[// >